Complaint about North American Coal (NAC)

The 2022 Formal Complaint sent to the Public Service Commission (PSC) - Eisenbeis Farmland - pdf document

   Appendix A - The 2019 PSC Complaint Decision Letter - 13 Jun 2019 - pdf document
   ... PSC ruled that it is not mining related ... Comments have been added by Clyde Eisenbeis

   Appendix B - North American Coal Dishonest Response Letter - 19 Jun 2018 - pdf document
   ... Numerous errors ... Comments have been added by Clyde Eisenbeis

   Appendix C - North American Coal Proposed Approach Agreement - 22 Sep 2017 - pdf document
   ... NAC is not liable for damage ... Comments have been added by Clyde Eisenbeis

   Appendix D - North American Coal Threatening Letter - 5 Jul 2018 - pdf document
   ... Numerous errors ... Comments have been added by Clyde Eisenbeis

   Appendix E - Eisenbeis Farmland History Log - pdf document
   ... Accurately documents the history since 2011

   Appendix F - Eisenbeis Questions not allowed to ask - pdf document
   ... at the 2019 PSC meeting

   The 2022 PSC Formal Complaint Final Decision Letter - 27 Sep 2022 - pdf document
   ... Per the PSC Commissioners, NAC is not liable for damage to property
   ... ... Comments have been added by Clyde Eisenbeis

   Addendum 1 - Should be classified as Perjury - pdf document
   ... at the 2022 PSC meeting

   Addendum 2 - Dishonest NAC Comments - pdf document
   ... at the 2022 PSC meeting

   Addendum 3 - Pond water discharge exceeds rainfall - pdf document
   ... at the 2022 PSC meeting

Damage to Farmland Summary 7-Nov-2022

A Formal Complaint was filed with the Public Service Commission in Sep.

The PSC Commissioners (Julie Fedorchak, Randy Christmann, and Sheri Haugen Hoffart) made decisions that oppose the Formal Complaint. That PSC decision included statements such as �no proof� and this is a �private matter�.

The photos taken by PSC staff (taken before and after) contain dates. The PSC Commissioners do not consider this to be proof.

The PSC statement that this is a private matter is a surprise. Suppose someone burned down your Mom�s house. The arsonist claimes that your Mom said it was ok. The arsonist also states that this is a private matter between the arsonist and your Mom.

In addition, intentionally digging ditches on someone else�s land and blocking access to farmland is a crime. The PSC did not contact the Mercer County Sheriff.

This is a grave injustice. NAC dug the ditches on the farmland. The farmland owners are expected to pay for repairing the damage using retirement savings.

The PSC Commissioners are not enforcing ND laws that protect people and their property.

NDCC (North Dakota Century Code) 38-14.1 Surface Mining and Reclamation Operations

   NDCC (North Dakota Century Code) 38-14.1-02 (35 b) "Surface coal mining operations means: The areas upon which such activities occur or where such activities disturb the natural land surface. Such areas shall also include any adjacent land the use of which is incidental to any such activities"

NDAC (North Dakota Administrative Code) 69-05.2 Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation Operations

   NDAC 69-05.2-01-02 (1) "Adjacent area means land located outside the affected area or permit area"

PSC Memorandum

   PSC Memorandum 6 to Mine Operators, March 8, 1995 "... activities and disturbances must be conducted within the boundaries of a surface coal mining permit ...."


Photos of the farmland damage were taken by the PSC during multiple years. Per the PSC Commissioners, these photos are not adequate proof.

The contents of Appendix B - North American Coal (NAC) Dishonest Response Letter contains hearsay. The statement on the witness-stand by Sarah Flath (NAC) that this document is accurate, is perjury.

Also, if Miss Flath comments, about obtaining permission to damage property from a person who has Alzheimer�s, is accurate, that is a crime.

Original road ditch, 6 Mar 2008, PSC Photo

Road ditch, deepened by NAC, too deep for grain trucks, erosion has begun, 26 Apr 2018, PSC Photo

Road ditch continues to erode, 3 Jun 2021, Agweek photo

Original diversion ditch, 6 Mar 2008, PSC Photo

Diversion ditch deepened by NAC, 16 Sep 2014, PSC Photo

More PSC photos taken on:
   6 Mar 2008 photos before North American Coal (NAC) damage
   31 Aug 2011 photos after NAC damage
   16 Sep 2014 photos after more NAC damage and NAC land modification
   26 Apr 2018 photos after more NAC damage and more NAC land modification

North American Coal (NAC) is required to obtain a permit to dig on NAC land.

Is allowed to dig on land that someone else owns without a permit?

Is NAC allowed to block access to farmland? Clyde Eisenbeis did provide NAC with written authorization to install an approach - pdf document.

Is NAC is allowed to discharge coal mine pond water into a creek on the farmland even if floods farmland/?

A North American Coal (NAC) sedimentation pond overflowed on the Esther Eisenbeis farmland which damaged farmland and farmland crops in 2011 and 2014. Sedimentation pond netting was found in multiple places on the the Esther Eisenbeis farmland.

NAC dug a deep drainage ditch on the farmland in 2012 and 2014 without authorization from the land owner.

NAC also dug the road ditch deeper without authorization from the land owner, and without authorization from Mercer County. The ditch is so deep that grain trucks can no longer cross the ditch. The combine needs to travel across the ditch to unload the grain onto a truck. The land owner and county did not know, until 2016, this occurred.

NAC discharged sedimentation pond water into the the Esther Eisenbeis farmland creek on the north end (water flows north into Lake Sakakawea). The volume of water caused the water to also flow south. This raised the water table elevation to the farmland elevation.

This elevated water table caused problems on the Wayne Eisenbeis farmland south of the Esther Eisenbeis farmland, the flooded the SW corner of the Esther Eisenbeis farmland over a span of many years. It also flooded a neighbor�s farmland and basement north of the Esther Eisenbeis farmland.

The Public Service Commission (PSC) took photos of the farmland in 2008, 2011, 2014, and 2018 These photos document the damage and land modifications by NAC.

NAC verbally agreed to install an approach across the deep road ditch on 13 Apr 2016. NAC did not install the approach.

On 28 Apr 2017 (a year later) NAC stated the approach was not installed because there was no written authorization. Clyde Eisenbeis immediately emailed a written authorization to NAC and the PSC. NAC has acknowledged receiving that written authorization.

A Formal Complaint was submitted to the PSC on 15 May 2019. The PSC decided this is not related to coal mining.

--- Facts ---

1) Sedimentation ponds are related to coal mining.

2) Sedimentation pond netting was found on the farmland.

3) NAC discharge of mining pond water into the farmland creek raised the water table elevation. The water table elevation measurements (a half mile south of the farmland) show the elevation was raised to the farmland elevation which flooded farmland.

4) NAC dug the deep drainage ditch and deepened the road ditch.

Clyde Eisenbeis exchanged emails with the PSC staff and met with them at the farmland and at the PSC office multiple times starting in 2016.

The PSC received a response letter from NAC dated 19 Jun 2018. That NAC letter was not given to Clyde Eisenbeis until 10 Jun 2019. That NAC letter has errors and dishonest statements (see Appendices).

Clyde Eisenbeis filed a Formal Complaint with the PSC in 2019. The PSC Commissioners met on 12 Jun 2019 to discuss the complaint. Clyde Eisenbeis was not allowed to speak at that meeting.

The PSC Commissioners decided that this is "not" coal mining related (see Appendices), even though:
   1) NAC sedimentation pond water overflow caused the damages,
   2) NAC discharged sedimentation pond water
which flooded farmland, and
   3) NAC dug the ditches

Agweek article, Nov 2021
   North Dakota landowner says North American Coal owes him a field approach website
Road ditch, blocking acesss to farmland, is continuing to erode - 2021

North Dakota Century Code (NDCC) website
   38 Mining and Gas and Oil Production website
   38-14.1 Surface Mining and Reclamation Operations website
   38-14.1-01 Declaration of findings and intent
   38-14.1-01 (1) --- disturbances of surface areas ... by damaging the property of citizens
   38-14.1-02 Definitions
   38-14.1-02 (17) --- Permit area means land approved for surface coal mining operations
   38-14.1-02 (19) --- Permit revision mean modification of permit and includes changes in the mining plans boundary extensions
   38-14.1-02 (34) --- Surface coal mining operations means surface coal mining
   38-14.1-02 (35 a) --- activities affecting the surface of lands in connection with surface coal mine
   38-14.1-02 (35 b) --- areas where activities disturb natural land surface ... includes adjacent land
   38-14.1-14 Permit applications - Mining and reclamation plans
   38-14.1-14 (1) Permit applications ... must contain
                        (r 13) Permit applications ... must contain the location of any discharges to any surface body of water on the area of land to be affected or adjacent thereto
   38-14.1-21 (3 c) Prevent damage to the hydrologic balance outside the permit area
   38-14.1-24 Environmental protection performance standards
   38-14.1-24 (8) Minimize the disturbances to the prevailing hydrologic balance in associated offsite areas
                        (f) --- Avoiding natural channel deepening

North Dakota Administrative Code (NDAC) [Administrative Rules] website
   69 Public Service Commission website
   69-05.2 Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation Operations website
   69-05.2-01 General Provisions
   69-05.2-01-02 Definitions
   69-05.2-01-02 (1) ... Adjacent area means land located outside the affected area or permit area ....

PSC Public Awareness: Laws, Rules and Other, Interpretive Docs [Policy Memoranda] website